@article {1132,
	title = {Combining tumor genome simulation with crowdsourcing to benchmark somatic single-nucleotide-variant detection.},
	journal = {Nature methods},
	year = {2015},
	month = {2015 May 18},
	abstract = {The detection of somatic mutations from cancer genome sequences is key to understanding the genetic basis of disease progression, patient survival and response to therapy. Benchmarking is needed for tool assessment and improvement but is complicated by a lack of gold standards, by extensive resource requirements and by difficulties in sharing personal genomic information. To resolve these issues, we launched the ICGC-TCGA DREAM Somatic Mutation Calling Challenge, a crowdsourced benchmark of somatic mutation detection algorithms. Here we report the BAMSurgeon tool for simulating cancer genomes and the results of 248 analyses of three in silico tumors created with it. Different algorithms exhibit characteristic error profiles, and, intriguingly, false positives show a trinucleotide profile very similar to one found in human tumors. Although the three simulated tumors differ in sequence contamination (deviation from normal cell sequence) and in subclonality, an ensemble of pipelines outperforms the best individual pipeline in all cases. BAMSurgeon is available at https://github.com/adamewing/bamsurgeon/.},
	keywords = {cancer, NGS, variant calling},
	issn = {1548-7105},
	doi = {10.1038/nmeth.3407},
	url = {http://www.nature.com/nmeth/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nmeth.3407.html},
	author = {Ewing, Adam D and Houlahan, Kathleen E and Hu, Yin and Ellrott, Kyle and Caloian, Cristian and Yamaguchi, Takafumi N and Bare, J Christopher and P{\textquoteright}ng, Christine and Waggott, Daryl and Sabelnykova, Veronica Y and Kellen, Michael R and Norman, Thea C and Haussler, David and Friend, Stephen H and Stolovitzky, Gustavo and Margolin, Adam A and Stuart, Joshua M and Boutros, Paul C},
	editor = {ICGC-TCGA DREAM Somatic Mutation Calling Challenge participants and Liu Xi and Ninad Dewal and Yu Fan and Wenyi Wang and David Wheeler and Andreas Wilm and Grace Hui Ting and Chenhao Li and Denis Bertrand and Niranjan Nagarajan and Qing-Rong Chen and Chih-Hao Hsu and Ying Hu and Chunhua Yan and Warren Kibbe and Daoud Meerzaman and Kristian Cibulskis and Mara Rosenberg and Louis Bergelson and Adam Kiezun and Amie Radenbaugh and Anne-Sophie Sertier and Anthony Ferrari and Laurie Tonton and Kunal Bhutani and Nancy F Hansen and Difei Wang and Lei Song and Zhongwu Lai and Liao, Yang and Shi, Wei and Carbonell-Caballero, Jos{\'e} and Joaqu{\'\i}n Dopazo and Cheryl C K Lau and Justin Guinney}
}
@article {1087,
	title = {Assessing technical performance in differential gene expression experiments with external spike-in RNA control ratio mixtures.},
	journal = {Nature communications},
	volume = {5},
	year = {2014},
	month = {2014},
	pages = {5125},
	abstract = {There is a critical need for standard approaches to assess, report and compare the technical performance of genome-scale differential gene expression experiments. Here we assess technical performance with a proposed standard {\textquoteright}dashboard{\textquoteright} of metrics derived from analysis of external spike-in RNA control ratio mixtures. These control ratio mixtures with defined abundance ratios enable assessment of diagnostic performance of differentially expressed transcript lists, limit of detection of ratio (LODR) estimates and expression ratio variability and measurement bias. The performance metrics suite is applicable to analysis of a typical experiment, and here we also apply these metrics to evaluate technical performance among laboratories. An interlaboratory study using identical samples shared among 12 laboratories with three different measurement processes demonstrates generally consistent diagnostic power across 11 laboratories. Ratio measurement variability and bias are also comparable among laboratories for the same measurement process. We observe different biases for measurement processes using different mRNA-enrichment protocols.},
	keywords = {RNA-seq},
	issn = {2041-1723},
	doi = {10.1038/ncomms6125},
	url = {http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2014/140925/ncomms6125/full/ncomms6125.html},
	author = {Munro, Sarah A and Lund, Steven P and Pine, P Scott and Binder, Hans and Clevert, Djork-Arn{\'e} and Ana Conesa and Dopazo, Joaquin and Fasold, Mario and Hochreiter, Sepp and Hong, Huixiao and Jafari, Nadereh and Kreil, David P and Labaj, Pawe{\l} P and Li, Sheng and Liao, Yang and Lin, Simon M and Meehan, Joseph and Mason, Christopher E and Santoyo-L{\'o}pez, Javier and Setterquist, Robert A and Shi, Leming and Shi, Wei and Smyth, Gordon K and Stralis-Pavese, Nancy and Su, Zhenqiang and Tong, Weida and Wang, Charles and Wang, Jian and Xu, Joshua and Ye, Zhan and Yang, Yong and Yu, Ying and Salit, Marc}
}
